Post by bfxwwhat's the answer about question 5 ?
5) did u consider that JCRWebdavServerServlet will support
those properties which are defined by customer,like
SimpleWebdavServlet PropertyHandler mechanism , in jackrabbit
later release?
hm. it seems you didn't understand my previous ansers.
let's try again:
JCRWebdavServerServlet is intended for remoting JCR-calls via
webdav and is not indended to be a 'standard' webdav-server. this
is already pointed out in the jackrabbit website.
there is no use in adding a 'generic' proppatch mechanism to
it. for the exact usage of that remoting protocol please take
a look at the docu present on the website.
if you are looking for a standard webdav server, simply
forget about the JCRWebdavServerServlet.
Post by bfxwin addition,I have some new questions ,please help me ,thanks
1. what'is the time schedule of jackrabbit 1.4?
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.jackrabbit.devel/15972
Post by bfxw2.I know jackrabbit supports Same Name Siblings.
does webav not support the Same–Name Siblings nodes?
because 2518 specify that the OVERWRITE header must be T in
MOVE request.so if i want to move A/c to B,
but B already have a child node named c, I must overwrite the
B/c node.
sorry i don't get what you question is.
if you MOVE request is indicated to overwrite existing resources
that resource gets removed before the move is executed. if
if however overwriting is not forced and the destination exists
the MOVE fails. as far as i know, this is the expected behaviour.
Post by bfxwwhat is Jackrabbit SPI ?
did you read the summary regarding SPI on the jackrabbit
website? i guess that would answer your question.
Post by bfxwI found the src of spi package in svn
are more easy to be used for customer,who want to do a webdav
request,
than jackrabbit webdav package classes, why can i not
find the SPI classes in jackrabbit 1.3 jars?
SPI interfaces, jcr2spi and an example spi implementation
is released with jackrabbit 1.4.
Post by bfxwHow can I get the jackrabbit SPI jars?
jackrabbit 1.4 or get the jackrabbit source and build it.
but honestly i don't see what you what you want to do with
the spi interfaces if you are looking for a webdav server.
if the latter is not true, i totally misinterpreted your
previous questions.
angela
Post by bfxwPost by Angela SchreiberPost by bfxwplease help me for clarifing the following question, thank u very much
1. DeltaV-Compliant webdav server must supported RFC3253, right?
actually i used deltaV as a synonym of rfc 3253. thats bit sloppy
and probably not totally correct.
rfc 3253 describes the 'versioning' of webdaV. the term DeltaV
is used with the rfc (e.g. 'the DeltaV design team') but also
with a specific meaning: 'DeltaV compliant resource'.
rfc 3253 defines more than one compliance class and so
supporting rfc 3253 is not very precise either.
which compliance classes are implemented must be indicated
by the corresponding webdav header.
Post by bfxw2. SimpleWebdavServlet support RFC2518 but don't support RFC3253;
that not correct. with jackrabbit-1.4 the simple server
supports some of the features defined by rfc 3253: if i'm
not mistaken this includes: version-control, version-history and
label.
merge/update could be implemented as well (but i guess
it's not yet done).
activity/baseline could be implemented as soon as of jsr 283.
Post by bfxwJCRWebdavServerServlet support RFC2518 and RFC3253, right?
right. as above: not the complete functionality of rfc 3253 but
only that one used for remoting of JCR calls.
Post by bfxw3.if my resource is version controled,i should use
JCRWebdavServerServlet
not SimpleWebdavServlet ,but JCRWebdavServerServlet does not support
those properties which are defined by myself. right?
use simple webdav servlet.
see above and for the reason mentioned before (difference between
to two): the JCRWebdavServerServlet
exposes bothe jcr-nodes and jcr-properties as resources and
the dav-properties they expose is defined with the remoting
protocol (see jackrabbit website for that).
Post by bfxw4.SimpleWebdavServlet will support RFC3253 in jackrabbit 1.4 release,right?
yes.
regards
angela